Re: 2.9test9-mm1 and DAO ATAPI cd-burning corrupt
From: bill davidsen (davidsen_at_tmr.com)
Date: 11/11/03
- Previous message: Ihar 'Philips' Filipau: "Re: OT: why no file copy() libc/syscall ??"
- In reply to: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: 2.9test9-mm1 and DAO ATAPI cd-burning corrupt"
- Next in thread: bill davidsen: "Re: 2.9test9-mm1 and DAO ATAPI cd-burning corrupt"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: 11 Nov 2003 15:31:26 GMT
In article <Pine.LNX.4.53.0311110942280.8688@montezuma.fsmlabs.com>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
| On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, bill davidsen wrote:
|
| > Looking at the system time being used I would say that this is doing
| > something odd. If that's using DMA then for some reason is it doing a
| > shitload of system calls at those times? I bet you're losing interrupts,
| > getting nasty mousing, and I would wonder about dropping incoming
| > network packets as well.
| That looks like fairly low system time and generally idle system to me,
| and the interrupt rate isn't high at all.
Yes, I added a followup a few minutes later noting that I had a
line-wrap problem and misread the data. I haven't seen that post, but
that's what happened.
-- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Ihar 'Philips' Filipau: "Re: OT: why no file copy() libc/syscall ??"
- In reply to: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: 2.9test9-mm1 and DAO ATAPI cd-burning corrupt"
- Next in thread: bill davidsen: "Re: 2.9test9-mm1 and DAO ATAPI cd-burning corrupt"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]