Re: 2.6 early userspace init
From: Bryan O'Sullivan (bos_at_serpentine.com)
Date: 11/12/03
- Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC 0/5] Backing Store for sysfs (Overhauled)"
- In reply to: Michael Schroeder: "2.6 early userspace init"
- Next in thread: Michael Schroeder: "Re: 2.6 early userspace init"
- Reply: Michael Schroeder: "Re: 2.6 early userspace init"
- Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: 2.6 early userspace init"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Michael Schroeder <mls@suse.de> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 08:45:19 -0800
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 03:50, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> how about adding something like this to init/do_mounts.c?
It's not a bad idea, but surely you should be using the init= boot
parameter instead of hard-coding a path.
In any case, I don't think you should expect a patch to be accepted.
There's not much point in further crufting up do_mounts.c in generic
kernels during 2.6, until do_mounts moves completely out of the kernel.
Some people are happy enough with root=0:0, so there's not obviously a
consensus about which stopgap measure will do for now.
<b
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC 0/5] Backing Store for sysfs (Overhauled)"
- In reply to: Michael Schroeder: "2.6 early userspace init"
- Next in thread: Michael Schroeder: "Re: 2.6 early userspace init"
- Reply: Michael Schroeder: "Re: 2.6 early userspace init"
- Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: 2.6 early userspace init"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
