Re: 2.6.0-test10-mm1

From: Martin J. Bligh (mbligh_at_aracnet.com)
Date: 11/26/03

  • Next message: Kai Bankett: "Re: [PATCH] irq_balance does not make sense with HT but single physical CPU" 
    Date:	Wed, 26 Nov 2003 08:23:52 -0800
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>

    > On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 05:29:00AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
    >> But I do not think that making a single kernel symbol inaccessible is an
    >> appropriate way of resolving a GPFS licensing dispute.
    >
    > well, GFPS is a derived work with or without it. It's just that I remember
    > we had that agreement about merging it only with the _GPL export. In fact
    > I'm pretty sure Paul told something about GPLed distributed filesystems from
    > IBM in that context..

    IBM has (at the very least) 2 clustered filesystems that use this. One is
    GPL'ed, the other (GPFS) is not.

    M.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  • Next message: Kai Bankett: "Re: [PATCH] irq_balance does not make sense with HT but single physical CPU"