Re: Question - non-exec stack
From: Breno (brenosp_at_brasilsec.com.br)
Date: 11/28/03
- Previous message: Måns Rullgård: "Re: Question - non-exec stack"
- In reply to: Måns Rullgård: "Re: Question - non-exec stack"
- Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: Question - non-exec stack"
- Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: Question - non-exec stack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Måns Rullgård <mru@kth.se> Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:57:09 -0200
Yes , 32 bit Intel processors
Breno
----- Original Message -----
From: "Måns Rullgård" <mru@kth.se>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: Question - non-exec stack
"Breno" <brenosp@brasilsec.com.br> writes:
> I´d like to know how non-exec stack can run on 32 bits processor. On
32bits
> processor vm_exec and vm_read has the same flags . So your tasks will not
> run very well.
This doesn't have anything to do with the CPU word size, does it? I
guess you mean 32 bit Intel processors.
-- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Måns Rullgård: "Re: Question - non-exec stack"
- In reply to: Måns Rullgård: "Re: Question - non-exec stack"
- Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: Question - non-exec stack"
- Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: Question - non-exec stack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
