Re: Better performance with pdc20376 compared to SiI 3112
From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik_at_pobox.com)
Date: 11/30/03
- Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH][2.6] e100_phy.c uses free'd .text after init"
- In reply to: Eduard Hasenleithner: "Better performance with pdc20376 compared to SiI 3112"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:09:28 -0500 To: Eduard Hasenleithner <ehasenle@spamcop.net>
Eduard Hasenleithner wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Although I like the SiI 3112 due it's open specs I found that the
> somehow "closed" pdc20376 promise chip performs essentially better
> with the new GPL drivers on a non-tweaked 2.6.0-test11 kernel :(
> With SiI 3112 I get about 16MB/s, with pdc20376 54MB/s, which is
> most likely the maximum harddisk performance of my seagate drive.
Like Bart mentioned, both Promise and SiI are the same: closed specs,
GPL'd driver.
> So what is the status of the siimage driver? Can I expect it to
> improve in further kernel releases?
I certainly hope so :) We're actively discussing the 3112 errata fix
right now...
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH][2.6] e100_phy.c uses free'd .text after init"
- In reply to: Eduard Hasenleithner: "Better performance with pdc20376 compared to SiI 3112"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
