Re: Oops with tmpfs on both 2.4.22 & 2.6.0-test11
From: William Lee Irwin III (wli_at_holomorphy.com)
Date: 11/30/03
- Previous message: James Bourne: "2.4.23/others and ip_conntrack causing hangs"
- In reply to: James W McMechan: "Oops with tmpfs on both 2.4.22 & 2.6.0-test11"
- Next in thread: James W McMechan: "Re: Oops with tmpfs on both 2.4.22 & 2.6.0-test11"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 11:27:51 -0800 To: James W McMechan <mcmechanjw@juno.com>
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 08:57:26AM -0800, James W McMechan wrote:
> I have a test program much shorter then the Oops
> If someone wants to work from a Oops I will send
> one, no maintainer was listed and the last Google
> reference is about 2 years back, and it does not
> seem to be about this issue.
> This Oops both 2.4.22 and 2.6.0-test11
> It results from a ARCH=um bugreport and
> I kept making the test program shorter
> This seems silly but one line to Oops?
Please post the oops (run through ksymoops as-needed).
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: James Bourne: "2.4.23/others and ip_conntrack causing hangs"
- In reply to: James W McMechan: "Oops with tmpfs on both 2.4.22 & 2.6.0-test11"
- Next in thread: James W McMechan: "Re: Oops with tmpfs on both 2.4.22 & 2.6.0-test11"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|