Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)
From: Pavel Machek (pavel_at_ucw.cz)
Date: 12/01/03
- Previous message: Samuel Flory: "Re: libata in 2.4.24?"
- Next in thread: Craig Bradney: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Reply: Craig Bradney: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Maybe reply: ross.alexander_at_uk.neceur.com: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Maybe reply: Craig Bradney: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Maybe reply: Ian Kumlien: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Maybe reply: b_at_netzentry.com: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Maybe reply: Prakash K. Cheemplavam: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Maybe reply: walt: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Maybe reply: b_at_netzentry.com: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Maybe reply: Dan Creswell: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Maybe reply: Jussi Laako: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 19:30:46 +0100 To: Craig Bradney <cbradney@zip.com.au>
Hi!
> I am also using a 2 week old A7N8X Deluxe, v2 with the latest 1007 BIOS.
> I AM able to run 2.6 Test 11 with APIC, Local APIC and ACPI support
> turned on (SMP off, Preemptible Kernel off).
>
> Although the PC hasnt been under constant stress, uptime is over 12
> hours and its not the first time its been up for 12 or more with test 11
> (which was my first 2.6 kernel). Running Gentoo Linux btw.
Try noapic.
Pavel
-- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Samuel Flory: "Re: libata in 2.4.24?"
- Next in thread: Craig Bradney: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Reply: Craig Bradney: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Maybe reply: ross.alexander_at_uk.neceur.com: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Maybe reply: Craig Bradney: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Maybe reply: Ian Kumlien: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Maybe reply: b_at_netzentry.com: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Maybe reply: Prakash K. Cheemplavam: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Maybe reply: walt: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Maybe reply: b_at_netzentry.com: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Maybe reply: Dan Creswell: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Maybe reply: Jussi Laako: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|