Re: Catching NForce2 lockup with NMI watchdog - found?

From: Craig Bradney (cbradney_at_zip.com.au)
Date: 12/07/03

  • Next message: Jussi Laako: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)" 
    To: Ian Kumlien <pomac@vapor.com>
Date:	Sun, 07 Dec 2003 11:32:49 +0100

    On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 01:29, Ian Kumlien wrote:
    > On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 01:20, Craig Bradney wrote:
    > > On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 20:33, Ian Kumlien wrote:
    > > > Hi, i'm now running this patch and it survived my grep in /usr/src.
    > > >
    > > > It's mainly a correction of the apic patch and the ACPI halt disconnect
    > > > patch that was originally done for 2.6...
    > >
    > > Correction? how so? code looks the same, although the line numbers are
    > > completely different for mpparse.c and at that location there is
    > > different code. (Havent checked the disconnect)
    >
    > this is for 2.4.23 =)

    duh.. ok :)

    > > Or do u just mean combination of the two patches?
    >
    > Combination + for 2.4.23
    >
    > > > I'll get back to you about uptime, but i think this is it...
    > >
    > > Why do you think the disconnect is also related? (given some are just
    > > running the APIC patch and having (less/)no issues?
    >
    > Since i had issues with just the apic patch, as stated in my mail.

    oic.. sorry.. must have missed that.
    >
    > > > Although i would prefer a not so workaroundish approach =)
    > >
    > > 23 hrs now..
    >
    > I'm at 5:06 and thats a record for it running with apic.

    1d 9h here now..

    I remembered I also dont have preempt still, but I am happy with it if
    it stays like this. The next time I need to reboot (or get a hang), I'll
    recompile with preempt it and try again.

    Craig

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  • Next message: Jussi Laako: "Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)"

    Relevant Pages