Re: [patch] ide.c as a module
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (B.Zolnierkiewicz_at_elka.pw.edu.pl)
Date: 12/12/03
- Previous message: Maciej W. Rozycki: "Re: Catching NForce2 lockup with NMI watchdog"
- In reply to: Daniel Tram Lux: "Re: [patch] ide.c as a module"
- Next in thread: Krzysztof Halasa: "Re: [patch] ide.c as a module"
- Reply: Krzysztof Halasa: "Re: [patch] ide.c as a module"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Daniel Tram Lux <daniel@starbattle.com> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:37:31 +0100
On Friday 12 of December 2003 18:17, Daniel Tram Lux wrote:
> Hi Bartlomiej,
>
> I applied your changes only, reverting all of mine...
>
> moving the initializing=1 also solves the multiple init problem...thanks
>
> here is how the patch looks like now:
Thanks. I noticed that in 2.4 ide_probe_module() has revaldiate parameter
(I am currently fixing modules in 2.6 so I over-looked it before), so I need
to check if these changes are sufficient. If so I will submit to Marcelo.
Regards,
--bart
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Maciej W. Rozycki: "Re: Catching NForce2 lockup with NMI watchdog"
- In reply to: Daniel Tram Lux: "Re: [patch] ide.c as a module"
- Next in thread: Krzysztof Halasa: "Re: [patch] ide.c as a module"
- Reply: Krzysztof Halasa: "Re: [patch] ide.c as a module"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
