Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [OOPS, usbcore, releaseintf] 2.6.0-test10-mm1
From: Alan Stern (stern_at_rowland.harvard.edu)
Date: 12/12/03
- Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?"
- In reply to: David Brownell: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [OOPS, usbcore, releaseintf] 2.6.0-test10-mm1"
- Next in thread: Oliver Neukum: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [OOPS, usbcore, releaseintf] 2.6.0-test10-mm1"
- Reply: Oliver Neukum: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [OOPS, usbcore, releaseintf] 2.6.0-test10-mm1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 15:48:50 -0500 (EST) To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, David Brownell wrote:
> Alan Stern wrote:
>
> >>That would also reduce the length of time the address0_sem
> >>is held,
> >
> >
> > It would? How so?
>
> It would be dropped after the address is assigned (the bus
> no longer has an "address zero") ... rather than waiting
> until after the device was configured and all its interfaces
> were probed. I think that's the issue Oliver alluded to in
> his followup to your comment.
I thought it did that already. Oh well...
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?"
- In reply to: David Brownell: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [OOPS, usbcore, releaseintf] 2.6.0-test10-mm1"
- Next in thread: Oliver Neukum: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [OOPS, usbcore, releaseintf] 2.6.0-test10-mm1"
- Reply: Oliver Neukum: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [OOPS, usbcore, releaseintf] 2.6.0-test10-mm1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|