Re: Increasing HZ (patch for HZ > 1000)
From: Måns Rullgård (mru_at_kth.se)
Date: 12/13/03
- Previous message: Svetoslav Slavtchev: "Re: Multiple keyboard/monitor vs linux-2.6?"
- In reply to: Jean-Marc Valin: "Re: Increasing HZ (patch for HZ > 1000)"
- Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: Increasing HZ (patch for HZ > 1000)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 00:18:48 +0100
Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@USherbrooke.ca> writes:
> more sensitive at 1 kHz). Also, I have around 10% overhead on my
> Pentium-M 1.6 GHz, so I guess it's not for everyone. Extrapolating from
> there, I'd also say that at 100 kHz, it wouldn't do anything but handle
> the interrupts, which is slightly annoying when you want to actually get
> some work done :)
I once forgot to acknowledge an interrupt in the handler for a PCI
board. It ended up being called ~300k times per second. The system
load was noticeable.
-- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Svetoslav Slavtchev: "Re: Multiple keyboard/monitor vs linux-2.6?"
- In reply to: Jean-Marc Valin: "Re: Increasing HZ (patch for HZ > 1000)"
- Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: Increasing HZ (patch for HZ > 1000)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|