Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?
From: Jesse Pollard (jesse_at_cats-chateau.net)
Date: 12/18/03
- Previous message: Craig Bradney: "Re: Catching NForce2 lockup with NMI watchdog"
- In reply to: Randy Zagar: "Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?"
- Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Randy Zagar <jrzagar@cactus.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:24:50 -0600
On Thursday 18 December 2003 03:12, Randy Zagar wrote:
[snip]
> p.s. The first thing I'm going to do after I build my time machine is
> go visit Finland and say "Use the LGPL, Linus".
I believe he did, and he decided the LGPL did not apply since the Kernel is a
"main program", and not really a library.
Now if Linux were converted to a microkernel then things might be different.
Unfortunately, most of the hardware linux runs on doesn't support
the microkernel structure efficently (not enough general registers,
insufficiently fine grained memory address control, uncontroled DMA,
and too much time in context switching...)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Craig Bradney: "Re: Catching NForce2 lockup with NMI watchdog"
- In reply to: Randy Zagar: "Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?"
- Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|