Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x
From: James Bottomley (James.Bottomley_at_steeleye.com)
Date: 12/30/03
- Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] ia32 Message Signalled Interrupt support"
- Maybe in reply to: Willem Riede: "The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x"
- Next in thread: Willem Riede: "Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x"
- Reply: Willem Riede: "Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Willem Riede <wrlk@riede.org> Date: 30 Dec 2003 12:44:49 -0600
If people will have me, I am prepared to take on that responsibility.
I am just concerned that I may not have enough of a variety of devices
to be able to thoroughly test it (unless the DI-30 is the only one :-)).
What do people see as the requirements to be able to maintain ide-scsi?
Well...there's currently not a long line of people wanting to do this,
so feel free to send in patches (at least cc'd to linux-scsi so I can
pick them up easily), and we'll see how it goes.
In the long term, I think libata will end up assuming much of the role
that ide-scsi does now, but since it doesn't interface to a lot of
existing motherboard chipsets, we're going to need ide-scsi around for a
while at least.
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] ia32 Message Signalled Interrupt support"
- Maybe in reply to: Willem Riede: "The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x"
- Next in thread: Willem Riede: "Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x"
- Reply: Willem Riede: "Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
