Three kernel Oops/panic/BUG ksymoopses (kernel BUG at buffer.c:539)

From: Erik Bourget (erik_at_midmaine.com)
Date: 01/03/04

  • Next message: Wim Van Sebroeck: "[PATCH] 2.6.0-rc1 - Watchdog patches"
    To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
    Date:	Fri, 02 Jan 2004 18:31:58 -0500
    
    

    (crossposted between linux-kernel and netfilter users because some traces do
    go into nf_* and I'm using the conntrack module)

    Hello;

    I had a very bizarre situation where four boxes in the same rack all
    simultaneously (within 30 minutes) hard-locked with Oops messages. The boxes
    don't even have the same function - two of them are MXs that face the
    Internet, and the other two are spamassassin spamd boxes that receive
    messages, put a tag header up top, and send them back to the MX for
    filtering. It was during a very (ridiculously) high-load situation where all
    four boxes were running at their limit for a few hours.

    The kernel running on them was 2.4.23, patched from netfilter's patch-o-matic
    to include the ipt_connlimit module. Connlimit was active on the MXs, but not
    on the spamd boxes. .config-file is attached.

    I captured four panic messages. The results of ksymoops on these are
    attached. The one with a 'kernel BUG at buffer.c:539!' was a spamd box, the
    other three are from MXs (RESULT-4 is from one of the MXs crashing after this
    incident). Sadly, the stack traces don't appear to necessarily have anything
    to do with each other.

    The boxes have since had sparodic crashes, but not in unison like the first
    time.

    The MXs have been backgraded to 2.4.22+connlimit patch. One of them has
    crashed since, I could not grab the output as it was rebooted via a remote
    power box.

    Hardware:
            MXs: Dell PE 1650, dual P3 1.13GHz, 1024MB RAM, aacraid scsi
                 controller with 15k rpm drives.
            spamd: Dell PE 1750, dual P4 'Xeon' 2.4GHz, 1024MB RAM, Fusion MPT
                 scsi controller.

            The MXs have been functioning for a year as either nameservers or
            MXs-that-don't-do-spamassassin for some time flawlessly. The spamd
            boxes are new.

    Software:
            All debian woody, linux 2.4.23 with ipt_connlimit as module (not
            loaded on the spamd machines). MXs run qmail and thrash the disk
            quite a bit. All filesystems reiserfs. SMP kernels, no ACPI or APM
            etc.

    Is there a kernel problem here? If not, does anyone familiar with the chi of
    kernel stacktraces have any advice?

    Thanks,

    - Erik Bourget

    
    
    
    
    

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/






  • Next message: Wim Van Sebroeck: "[PATCH] 2.6.0-rc1 - Watchdog patches"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Security log chaos - could not get dsclient.exe to install on any 9x boxes
      ... the WinXP Home of 9x kernel. ... redhat box and 7 ME boxes. ... Sat for the Win2k Pro exam and did not pass. ... WinME is based on a win9x kernel, ...
      (microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz)
    • panic: "attempting to free lock on active lock list"
      ... I know I'm not running the latest 2.6.16 kernel on these boxes, so if the immediate response is to go back and do that, I will do so. ... On digging around the mailing lists, my best guess is a poor interaction between NFS and the FS layer, but it could also be just collateral damage from some other problem. ... I'm not positive that it is load related... ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [PATCH] ia64: change defconfig to NR_CPUS==1024
      ... >>> I suppose that depends on your expectations from defconfig. ... If the cpu limit is too low then ... Do you equate a 'defconfig' kernel with a generic kernel? ... > I think it is wrong to count the number of boxes. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • FreeBSD 5.3 wont compile kernel
      ... I used to have FreeBSD on two different boxes, each with a custom ... kernel. ... Just to be clear this is a fresh install on tho separate boxes that are ...
      (freebsd-questions)

    Loading