Re: 2.4.23 oops
From: Mike Fedyk (mfedyk_at_matchmail.com)
Date: 01/04/04
- Previous message: Christophe Saout: "Re: Possibly wrong BIO usage in ide_multwrite"
- In reply to: Cristiano De Michele: "Re: 2.4.23 oops"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 09:30:16 -0800 To: Cristiano De Michele <demichel@na.infn.it>
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 06:19:11PM +0100, Cristiano De Michele wrote:
> ok you were right it was the RAM, disabling the bank interleave and
> increasing the CAS latency in the BIOS settings it seems
> that now my system is pretty stable (using memtest86)
Good.
Did you try changing those two settings seperately? You may be able to have
the interleave with the higher cas latency, but you'll have to test with
memtest86 after each change...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Christophe Saout: "Re: Possibly wrong BIO usage in ide_multwrite"
- In reply to: Cristiano De Michele: "Re: 2.4.23 oops"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]