Re: removable media revalidation - udev vs. devfs or static /dev
From: Olaf Hering (olh_at_suse.de)
Date: 01/07/04
- Previous message: Olaf Hering: "Re: udev and devfs - The final word"
- In reply to: Jens Axboe: "Re: removable media revalidation - udev vs. devfs or static /dev"
- Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: removable media revalidation - udev vs. devfs or static /dev"
- Reply: Jens Axboe: "Re: removable media revalidation - udev vs. devfs or static /dev"
- Reply: Greg KH: "Re: removable media revalidation - udev vs. devfs or static /dev"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:25:15 +0100 To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
On Wed, Jan 07, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07 2004, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 07, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > > No need to put it in the kernel, user space fits the bil nicely. I don't
> > > see how this would lead to IO errors?
> >
> > Ok, how should it be done on my SCSI and parallel port ZIP? An ATAPI ZIP
^^^
"How"? We need a sane way to deal with removeable medias.
Do you have example code that can be put into the udev distribution?
-- USB is for mice, FireWire is for men! sUse lINUX ag, nÜRNBERG - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Olaf Hering: "Re: udev and devfs - The final word"
- In reply to: Jens Axboe: "Re: removable media revalidation - udev vs. devfs or static /dev"
- Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: removable media revalidation - udev vs. devfs or static /dev"
- Reply: Jens Axboe: "Re: removable media revalidation - udev vs. devfs or static /dev"
- Reply: Greg KH: "Re: removable media revalidation - udev vs. devfs or static /dev"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
