Re: sensors, again
From: Jose Luis Domingo Lopez (linux-kernel_at_24x7linux.com)
Date: 01/07/04
- Previous message: Nicolas Nilles: "Kernel 2.6.0 and i2c-viapro posible Bug"
- In reply to: Gene Heskett: "sensors, again"
- Next in thread: John Bradford: "Re: sensors, again"
- Reply: John Bradford: "Re: sensors, again"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 20:59:57 +0100 To: Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
On Wednesday, 07 January 2004, at 13:16:33 -0500,
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Is there a utility that can scan the kernel and tell me what has
> actually been builtin?
>
Just a "zcat /proc/config.gz" if you compiled the kernel with support
for it ("Enable access to .config through /proc/config.gz").
> I ask because there is no trace of the ic2_algobit in /sys, its one of
> the errors sensors reports, and it is (supposedly, thats why I ask
> this question) compiled in. No errors were noted during any of the
> about 20 or more kernel compiles I've done trying everyones ideas
> out.
>
The name of the driver is now "i2c-algo-bit.ko", not "ic2_algobit" :-)
You can find this driver under "I2C Algorithms" with the name of
"I2C bit-banging interfaces".
> Also, from a thread earlier today, I assume 2.6.1-rc2 is out, but
> ANAICT no announcement was made here on this list. Did I miss it,
> and if so can it be reposted? Everything that falls out of a kmail
> search has RE: in front of it.
>
It is out, but no official announcement has been done.
Greetings.
-- Jose Luis Domingo Lopez Linux Registered User #189436 Debian Linux Sid (Linux 2.6.1-rc2) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Nicolas Nilles: "Kernel 2.6.0 and i2c-viapro posible Bug"
- In reply to: Gene Heskett: "sensors, again"
- Next in thread: John Bradford: "Re: sensors, again"
- Reply: John Bradford: "Re: sensors, again"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
