Re: [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanity checking
From: Maciej Zenczykowski (maze_at_cela.pl)
Date: 01/10/04
- Previous message: Marcos D. Marado Torres: "Re: kernel 2.6.1 synaptics problems tapping and tap'n'drag"
- In reply to: Xavier Bestel: "Re: [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanity checking"
- Next in thread: Xavier Bestel: "Re: [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanity checking"
- Reply: Xavier Bestel: "Re: [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanity checking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 03:27:35 +0100 (CET) To: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>
> > Like binfmt_flat? :)
>
> .. or even zflat. Not that I'm proud of it, but it can effectively
> manage to produce rather compact executables :)
Probably one of those two, is this something new? Never heard of
either... :) Specs? Min bin file size? If this (one of these) is
guaranteed to be in any new kernel (i.e. can't be configed out like a.out)
then that would be enough (assuming this flat is slim file size wise).
Cheers,
MaZe.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Marcos D. Marado Torres: "Re: kernel 2.6.1 synaptics problems tapping and tap'n'drag"
- In reply to: Xavier Bestel: "Re: [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanity checking"
- Next in thread: Xavier Bestel: "Re: [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanity checking"
- Reply: Xavier Bestel: "Re: [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanity checking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]