Re: smp dead lock of io_request_lock/queue_lock patch

From: James Bottomley (James.Bottomley_at_steeleye.com)
Date: 01/12/04

  • Next message: Takashi Iwai: "Re: 2.6.1 + isaPnP + alsa = scheduling while atomic"
    To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
    Date:	12 Jan 2004 11:04:17 -0500
    
    

    On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 10:52, Doug Ledford wrote:
    > Well, the scsi-dledford-2.4 tree is intended to be someplace I can put
    > all the stuff I'm having to carry forward in our kernels, so that's
    > distinctly different than a driver update only tree. I could do that
    > separately and I have no problem doing that.

    I'll take that as a "yes" then ;-)

    Thanks for doing this, beacuse I really wasn't looking forward to trying
    to sort it all out.

    > As for the other stuff,
    > I'm not pushing to necessarily get any of my changes into mainline. I
    > would be happy if they make it there sometime as that would relieve load
    > off of me, but at the same time I *am* making some changes to the core
    > code (sorry Jens, but there are some ways in which the 2.4 core scsi
    > code is just too broken to believe and leaving it broken just means
    > dealing with everyone that points it out in bugzilla entries) and I know
    > people are loath to change core code in mainline, so I kinda figured a
    > lot of that stuff would either A) stay separate or B) only after myself
    > and other interested parties agree on a patch and that patch is widely
    > tested and known good then maybe it might get moved over, up to Marcelo.

    I trust your judgement about this, so it sounds like we have the
    beginnings of a good working model for 2.4

    James

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  • Next message: Takashi Iwai: "Re: 2.6.1 + isaPnP + alsa = scheduling while atomic"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
      ... > into mainline as it is today. ... Suspend2 and part of those stats you saw in July. ... The patch currently ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Mercurial 0.4e vs git network pull
      ... where Daniel Barkalow told me that... ... > In the present mainline, you first have to find the head commit you ... I have a patch which does this for you over the same ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [RFC 0/6] S3 SMP support with physcial CPU hotplug
      ... > Should I merge that thing into mainline? ... > needing it. ... I have patch that cleans up smp/swsusp to ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • [INPUT] mousedev touchpad functionality additions for inclusion into 2.6.9?
      ... Any change of this going into mainline? ... Shawn. ... I don't know where this patch is added from ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [PATCH] oom killer (Core)
      ... > Your patch was orthogonal to mine, ... > mainline, for mainline it'd be a waste of time. ... several instances of bad OOM killer behavior already, ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)