Re: kgdb cleanups

From: Amit S. Kale (amitkale_at_emsyssoft.com)
Date: 01/14/04

  • Next message: Amit S. Kale: "Re: [discuss] Re: kgdb for x86_64 2.6 kernels"
    To: George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
    Date:	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:50:25 +0530
    
    

    On Wednesday 14 Jan 2004 2:50 am, George Anzinger wrote:
    > Amit S. Kale wrote:
    > > Regarding pluggable iterfaces -
    > > The version I have lets a user to choose the interface by supplying
    > > appropriate command line. (e.g. kgdbwait kgdb8250=... or kgdbwait
    > > kgdbeth=...) It supports an arbitrary number of interfaces. The kgdb core
    > > itself is independent of an interface. All interfaces are defined by a
    > > structure described below. An interface registers itself with kgdb core
    > > by assigning this structure to pointer kgdb_serial.
    > >
    > > struct kgdb_serial {
    > > int chunksize;
    >
    > Do we really need this? The only place I saw it used it did not seem to
    > matter where the split occured and there was now endchunck/beginchunck
    > stuff. I would MUCH rather see the interface code take care of this with
    > out mucking up the core code (as the eth code already does). Did I miss
    > something here?

    Having an interface recognize a kgdb core record isn't a good design.
    Having kgdb core record know interface limitations isn't good either.

    If kgdb calls flush at end of a packet and an interface splits a packet
    whenever its length goes above its limit, that'll be the right way of doing
    it.

    >
    > > int (*read_char)(void);
    > > void (*write_char)(int);
    > > void (*flush)(void);
    > > int (*hook)(void);
    > > void (*begin_session)(void);
    > > void (*end_session)(void);
    > > };
    > >
    > > Where chunksize is maximum chunksize an interface can handle.
    > >
    > > read_char and write_char are derived from getDebugChar and putDebugChar
    > > flush flushes written characters. Flush control is given to kgdb core so
    > > that it can ensure that #checksum doesn't split.
    >
    > Actually, I think it is needed so that gdb knows that the kgdb stub has
    > exited. This could, of course, be done with out the flush, but then the
    > write code would have to recognize an end of record (not hard with the
    > given protocol). I don't think there is any requirement that a checksum
    > not be split. My assumption here is that the logical record is reassembled
    > on the gdb end without concern about how many physical records are
    > involved. Is this not true?

    I guess yes. Splitting of #checksum may not matter.

    >
    > > begin_session and end_session inform an interface about a gdb
    > > communication session. (Haven't decided about console packets to gdb yet)
    >
    > I assume you mean entry to the stub/ exit the stub as a "session". This
    > eliminates the old hook, right?

    Yes. begin_session and end_session mark entry and exit points into
    handle_exception. They are required to mark ethernet interface in trap mode.

    What's old hook?

    >
    > > hook is interface initialization. It can return errors. This allows kgdb
    > > core to probe the interface for availability at multiple points. Because
    > > of this, there can be multiple debugger entry points
    > > 1. At very begining of start_kernel -> Only an 8250 interface with early
    > > boot enabled can respond to hook call.
    > > 2. After smp initialization -> An 8250 interface without an early boot
    > > can respond to this.
    > > 3. An ethernet interface can itself call debugger_entry to enter debugger
    > > after it's brought up from userland.
    >
    > Hm.. Eth is up way before user land, else we could not nfs mount root and
    > all that that implies. I think eth should be "available" when it is
    > initialized. I am not sure I see a reason to support a way to get to kgdb
    > from user land. We have ^C and also the Sys Rq entry. That should be
    > enough.

    Pardon my poor knowledge of network stack. I still have to work out the
    details of how and when to start kgdb-ethernet connection.

    Now that you mention it, I'll think about it. I can actually bring up an
    ethernet interface from kgdb eth code itself and associate an ip address with
    it.

    >
    > Also, as mention in a prior email, I don't think it is a good idea to
    > switch interfaces once communication is started, unless commanded to do so,
    > even if the default request is to use an inteface that just came up.

    Agreed.

    -amit

    >
    > I would suggest the the readyness of an interface be something one can
    > easily determine from gdb (assuming we have established a connection). I
    > suggest putting this in the kgdb_info structure. Possibly a pointer to an
    > array of ??? where each entry is one of the interfaces. Should have an
    > "up" value here (filled in by the hook calls), as well as, say a pointer to
    > more details on the interface. The details might be baud, irq, address,
    > for serial, and the ip address, etc for eth.
    >
    > -g
    >
    > > Other interfaces can come up at (1) or (2)
    > >
    > > On Monday 12 Jan 2004 12:19 pm, Matt Mackall wrote:
    > >>On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:41:57PM -0800, George Anzinger wrote:
    > >>>For the internal kgdb stuff I have created kdgb_local.h which I intended
    > >>>to be local to the workings of kgdb and not to contain anything a user
    > >>>would need.
    > >>
    > >>Agreed, I just haven't touched it since you last mentioned it.
    > >>
    > >>>>+struct kgdb_hook {
    > >>>>+ char *sendbuf;
    > >>>>+ int maxsend;
    > >>>
    > >>>I don't see the need of maxsend, or sendbuff, for that matter, as kgdb
    > >>>uses it now (for the eth code) it is redundant, in that the eth putchar
    > >>>also does the same thing as is being done in the kgdb_stub.c code. I
    > >>>think this should be removed from the stub and the limit in the ethcode
    > >>>relied upon.
    > >>
    > >>Fair enough.
    > >>
    > >>>>void
    > >>>>putDebugChar(int c)
    > >>>>{
    > >>>>- if (!kgdboe) {
    > >>>>- tty_putDebugChar(c);
    > >>>>- } else {
    > >>>>- eth_putDebugChar(c);
    > >>>>- }
    > >>>>+ if (kh)
    > >>>>+ kh->putchar(c);
    > >>>>}
    > >>>
    > >>>I was thinking that this might read something like:
    > >>> if (xxx[kh].putchar(c))
    > >>> xxx[kh].putchar(c);
    > >>>
    > >>>One might further want to do something like:
    > >>> if (!xxx[kh].putchar(c))
    > >>> kh = 0;
    > >>>
    > >>>In otherwords, an array (xxx must, of course, be renamed) of stuct
    > >>>kgdb_hook (which name should also be changed to relate to I/O,
    > >>>kgdb_IO_hook, for example). Then reserve entry 0 for the rs232 I/O code.
    > >>
    > >>Dunno about that. Probably should work more like the console code,
    > >>whoever registers first wins. Early boot will probably be the
    > >>exclusive province of serial for a while yet, but designing it in is
    > >>probably short-sighted.
    > >>
    > >>> An alternate possibility is an array of pointer to struct kgdb_hook
    > >>>which allows one to define the struct contents as below and to build the
    > >>>array, all at compile/link time. A legal entry MUST define get and put,
    > >>>but why not define them all, using dummy functions for the ones that
    > >>> make no sense in a particular interface.
    > >>
    > >>Throwing all the stubs in a special section could work well too. Then
    > >>we could add an avail() function so that early boot debugging could
    > >>discover if each one was available. The serial code could use this to
    > >>kickstart itself while the eth code could test a local initialized
    > >>flag and say "not a chance". Which gives us all the architecture to
    > >>throw in other trivial interfaces (parallel, bus-snoopers, etc.).

    -- 
    Amit Kale
    EmSysSoft (http://www.emsyssoft.com)
    KGDB: Linux Kernel Source Level Debugger (http://kgdb.sourceforge.net)
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    

  • Next message: Amit S. Kale: "Re: [discuss] Re: kgdb for x86_64 2.6 kernels"

    Relevant Pages

    • kgdb 2.0.5
      ... When using the ethernet interface, ... KGDB: Linux Kernel Source Level Debugger ... the questions about Ethernet network cards. ... +static int xlockholdcount = 0; ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: PPC KGDB changes and some help?
      ... I think kgdb should take control on oops, ... tried to connect to gdb as part of configuring the interface. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: RELENG_7 crash
      ... kgdb) bt ... Previous frame inner to this frame ... 123 #undef DONTCOPY ... Is it possible I am running into some of the interface lock fixes rwatson has been working on? ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • another kernel panic
      ... have another panic - on another interface now ... Jura ... #0 doadump at pcpu.h:165 ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: kgdb cleanups
      ... > Having an interface recognize a kgdb core record isn't a good design. ... I think this is what happens in the current eth code. ... To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ...
      (Linux-Kernel)