Re: VM_AREA size
From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa_at_zytor.com)
Date: 01/14/04
- Previous message: eddie tejeda: "VIA and NVIDIA"
- In reply to: Hugh Dickins: "Re: VM_AREA size"
- Next in thread: Mark Hounschell: "Re: VM_AREA size"
- Reply: Mark Hounschell: "Re: VM_AREA size"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:57:51 -0800 To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Mark Hounschell wrote:
>
>>What would the ramifications be of increasing VM_AREA size in
>>include/asm-i386/page.h from 128mb to 256mb. What would be the proper way to
>>increase this if the above isn't?
>
> I think you mean __VMALLOC_RESERVE? For the most part it's straightforward
> to bump it up. _However_, that breaks boot loader assumptions about where
> to load initrd, causing mayhem in that case (and initramfs?). That's
> second hand info: if I'm wrong or out-of-date, Peter is the authority
> and will correct me; or try Google VMALLOC_RESERVE boot.
>
I think it affects initramfs too.
It only affects boot loaders which don't support version 2.03 of the
boot protocol; unfortunately that includes GRUB last I checked.
We really need a better dialog with the GRUB people, unfortunately at
least I have unsuccessful in starting such a dialog.
GRUB, in particular, needs to report the boot loader ID they're using,
plus support version 2.03 of the protocol.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: eddie tejeda: "VIA and NVIDIA"
- In reply to: Hugh Dickins: "Re: VM_AREA size"
- Next in thread: Mark Hounschell: "Re: VM_AREA size"
- Reply: Mark Hounschell: "Re: VM_AREA size"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]