Re: bkbits going down for maintainance
From: Aaron Lehmann (aaronl_at_vitelus.com)
Date: 01/17/04
- Previous message: Condor: "Re: 2.4.24 may be bug in prints.c:341"
- In reply to: Larry McVoy: "Re: bkbits going down for maintainance"
- Next in thread: Larry McVoy: "Re: bkbits going down for maintainance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 12:35:14 -0800 To: Larry McVoy <lm@work.bitmover.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 10:19:51AM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote:
> We're back up, new case, quality power supply, running 2.4.22 (which I'm
> assuming is the right kernel to run, it seems to be what the distros are
> shipping).
As long as it's patched. Otherwise there are major security problems.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Condor: "Re: 2.4.24 may be bug in prints.c:341"
- In reply to: Larry McVoy: "Re: bkbits going down for maintainance"
- Next in thread: Larry McVoy: "Re: bkbits going down for maintainance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
