Re: [PATCH 2.6.2-rc1-mm2] fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
From: Bryan Whitehead (driver_at_jpl.nasa.gov)
Date: 01/25/04
- Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "Re: Kernels > 2.6.1-mm3 do not boot."
- In reply to: Bryan Whitehead: "Re: [PATCH 2.6.2-rc1-mm2] fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 17:10:16 -0800 To: Bryan Whitehead <driver@megahappy.net>
If I'm off base on this then sorry for the trouble. Just thought I'd
take a hit at getting rid of some compiler warnings..
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
> Oh, one more thing. After removed the superflurous switch statement flags
> will have a value which fixes the warning.
>
> If you look at the flow of code it is impossible for flags to not have a
> value when it gets to the if statement as the previous switch statement
> would give it a value. But since that switch statement only catches that
> one case anyway, it's better to merge the 2 switch statemnets.
>
> On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 11:31:11PM -0800, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
>>
>>>This fixes a warning on compile of the xfs fs module.
>>
>>This patch looks very strange. What error do you get without it?
>>
>
>
-- Bryan Whitehead Email:driver@megahappy.net WorkE:driver@jpl.nasa.gov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "Re: Kernels > 2.6.1-mm3 do not boot."
- In reply to: Bryan Whitehead: "Re: [PATCH 2.6.2-rc1-mm2] fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|