Re: Encrypted Filesystem
From: Adam Sampson (azz_at_us-lot.org)
Date: 01/27/04
- Previous message: David Martínez Moreno: "Re: kernel BUG at include/linux/list.h:148!"
- In reply to: Michael A Halcrow: "Encrypted Filesystem"
- Next in thread: Andy Isaacson: "Re: Encrypted Filesystem"
- Reply: Andy Isaacson: "Re: Encrypted Filesystem"
- Reply: Jan Harkes: "Re: Encrypted Filesystem"
- Reply: Miklos Szeredi: "Userspace filesystems (WAS: Encrypted Filesystem)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:43:21 +0000
Michael A Halcrow <mahalcro@us.ibm.com> writes:
> - Userland filesystem-based (EncFS+FUSE, CryptoFS+LUFS)
Going off on a tangent...
There are all sorts of potentially-interesting things that could be
done if Linux had a userspace filesystem mechanism included in the
standard kernel -- as well as encryption, there's also network
filesystems, various sorts of specialised caching (such as Zero
Install), automounter-like systems, prototyping and so on.
Is there a technical reason that none of the userspace filesystem
layers have been included in the stock kernel, or is it just that
nobody's submitted any of them for inclusion yet?
-- Adam Sampson <azz@us-lot.org> <http://offog.org/> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: David Martínez Moreno: "Re: kernel BUG at include/linux/list.h:148!"
- In reply to: Michael A Halcrow: "Encrypted Filesystem"
- Next in thread: Andy Isaacson: "Re: Encrypted Filesystem"
- Reply: Andy Isaacson: "Re: Encrypted Filesystem"
- Reply: Jan Harkes: "Re: Encrypted Filesystem"
- Reply: Miklos Szeredi: "Userspace filesystems (WAS: Encrypted Filesystem)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|