conformance, compliance and compatibility

From: Esben Stien (executiv_at_online.no)
Date: 01/30/04

  • Next message: Kallol Biswas: "receive path with fragmented skbs"
    To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
    Date:	30 Jan 2004 23:49:01 +0100
    
    

    I remember to have read that ISO has standardized on using
    conformance for everything that is conforming to a specific
    standard but I can't find it again. Anyone know where I could
    look?

    AFAIK, this is my understanding of these words

    Conformance has a deep root different meaning than compliance,
    but today that difference is not clear. However, ISO has
    standardized on using the word conformance and not compliance
    when saying something conforms to a standard.

    Compatibility is for hardware. You can say that a specific
    piece of hardware is compatible with another piece of hardware
    cause it speaks the same protocol. Compatibility is a way of
    saying that two components uses the same interfaces.

    You can not call a system unix today, cause unix today is a
    standard. The last unix was sysv. You can however say a system
    is conforming to unix (iso posix unix)(ieee 1003.1), so it is a
    unix conformant system. (to be technically correct).

    Is there any document that clarifies these words better. I'm
    looking for some official documentation from a standards body
    like ISO, IEC etc.

    I also see the words comformance and compliance used
    interchangably in RFC's, but to my knowledge I think I remember
    that RFC's where also supposed to be using conformance

    -- 
    b0ef
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    

  • Next message: Kallol Biswas: "receive path with fragmented skbs"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: XML and OO COBOL
      ... >> allowed the implementors to describe an implementation that had only the ... >> or they would not be in conformance, ... Quite right - Chuck is spelling it out like it is, constrained by rules, ...
      (comp.lang.cobol)
    • Re: Anyone object to the following change in libc?
      ... I don't know if we can say the ISO C standard has precedence here; ... This is actually recognized in conformance testing, ... > TL>requires you to compile with a c89 compiler, ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: Does a constraint violation cause undefined behavior?
      ... the standard should say so at ... I've pointed out for many years now that the conformance categories ... the translation unit, typically to continue processing to potentially ... generate additional diagnostics but also to go ahead and produce ...
      (comp.std.c)
    • Re: switch() Statement Question
      ... I would have thought that conformance is what a standard is all about. ... Ada has a set of validation tests that all conforming implementations ... wording about "the capacity of the implementation". ...
      (comp.lang.c)
    • C++ conformance?
      ... Where does eVC4 stand in terms of conformance to the ISO C++ standard? ... Is it more like VC6 or more like VC7.x? ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsce.embedded.vc)