Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x
From: Willem Riede (wrlk_at_riede.org)
Date: 01/31/04
- Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: ide taskfile and cdrom hang"
- In reply to: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x"
- Next in thread: Willem Riede: "Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x [PATCH 1/3]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:48:03 -0500 To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
On 2004.01.30 17:56, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Can you split your patch and drop cosmetic changes?
>
> I have troubles with reading/understanding it,
> I assume Jens has similar problems ;-).
Of course. I'll do that asap.
> BTW maybe we can move things forward:
> fix ide-scsi.c and carefully remove Onstream support from ide-tape.c?
Fixing ide-scsi is what the posted patch is all about.
I was looking for guidance on what you prefered to do with ide-tape,
so given that you would like to remove Onstream support from it, I
will come with a patch for that next.
Thanks, Willem Riede.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: ide taskfile and cdrom hang"
- In reply to: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x"
- Next in thread: Willem Riede: "Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x [PATCH 1/3]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|