Re: raid6 badness
From: Andi Kleen (ak_at_suse.de)
Date: 01/31/04
- Previous message: Jim Faulkner: "major network performance difference between 2.4 and 2.6.2-rc2"
- Maybe in reply to: Michael V. David: "raid6 badness"
- Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: raid6 badness"
- Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: raid6 badness"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Date: 31 Jan 2004 04:04:23 +0100
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> writes:
>
> I don't know what would cause the stack to be misaligned, however.
x86-64 kernel doesn't guarantee the stack to be 16 byte aligned
(although it usually is). If you need 16 byte alignment you have
to align yourself.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Jim Faulkner: "major network performance difference between 2.4 and 2.6.2-rc2"
- Maybe in reply to: Michael V. David: "raid6 badness"
- Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: raid6 badness"
- Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: raid6 badness"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|