Re: [Swsusp-devel] Software Suspend 2.0

From: Prakash K. Cheemplavam (PrakashKC_at_gmx.de)
Date: 01/31/04

  • Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: raid6 badness" 
    Date:	Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:19:14 +0100
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@clear.net.nz>

    Nigel Cunningham wrote:
    > Hi.
    >
    > On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 22:03, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
    >
    >>>Get the latest 2.6.1 patch (revision 7) and latest core patch (2.0) from
    >>>http://swsusp.sf.net.
    >>
    >>I am sorry, I only see a rev 6 patch. Will that also work?
    >
    >
    > You're right. I got the revision number for 2.4.24 stuck in my head.
    > rev6 is the right one.

    Ok, just trying it out. So far:

    Doing the kernel patch to 2.6.2-rc3, it asks me about a file missing in
    xfs. I skipped it. Then I used your patch you sent to lkml to fix things
    up. Finally I applied the core patch. Now it asks me

    The next patch would create the file kernel/power/swsusp2.c,
    which already exists! Assume -R? [n]

    Should this happen? What to do now?

    Prakash
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  • Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: raid6 badness"

    Relevant Pages