Re: [Swsusp-devel] Software Suspend 2.0
From: Nigel Cunningham (ncunningham_at_clear.net.nz)
Date: 01/31/04
- Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: raid6 badness"
- Maybe in reply to: Luke-Jr: "Re: [Swsusp-devel] Software Suspend 2.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 22:38:30 +1300 To: Qric?= Brunet <ebrunet@quatramaran.ens.fr>
No. The freezer changes would be the only related part.
Regards,
Nigel
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 22:35, Éric Brunet wrote:
> In linux-kernel, you wrote:
> >> Also, how does this differ from what is currently in the vanilla
> >> kernels?
> >
> > The best way to answer that is to point to
> > http://swsusp.sourceforge.net/features.html.
>
> No doubt that one day your work will be integrated, but will it help
> suspend to ram (acpi sleep state 3) ?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Éric Brunet
-- Nigel Cunningham 495 St Georges Road South, Hastings 4201, New Zealand Evolution (n): A hypothetical process whereby infinitely improbable events occur with alarming frequency, order arises from chaos, and no one is given credit. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: raid6 badness"
- Maybe in reply to: Luke-Jr: "Re: [Swsusp-devel] Software Suspend 2.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|