Re: BUG: NTPL: waitpid() doesn't return?
From: Matthias Urlichs (smurf_at_smurf.noris.de)
Date: 01/31/04
- Previous message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [patch] PCI Express Enhanced Config Patch - 2.6.0-test11"
- In reply to: bert hubert: "Re: BUG: NTPL: waitpid() doesn't return?"
- Next in thread: Roland McGrath: "Re: BUG: NTPL: waitpid() doesn't return?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 22:41:25 +0100 To: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, molnar@elte.hu, phil-list@redhat.com
Hi,
bert hubert:
> This means your situation is different from what you describe. Python may
> not in fact be doing 'real' threading on your setup.
Well, the strace was from Python, so probably I was missing something...
but I can't think of anything not-real which Python does, except that it
does synchronize its internal state with MANY futex calls. ;-)
> make the smallest possible python program that exhibits the program and send
> it to the list.
>
I'll do that.
-- Matthias Urlichs | noris network AG | http://smurf.noris.de/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [patch] PCI Express Enhanced Config Patch - 2.6.0-test11"
- In reply to: bert hubert: "Re: BUG: NTPL: waitpid() doesn't return?"
- Next in thread: Roland McGrath: "Re: BUG: NTPL: waitpid() doesn't return?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
