RE: Kernel 2.x POSIX Compliance/Conformance...
From: Torrey Hoffman (thoffman_at_arnor.net)
Date: 02/04/04
- Previous message: Jim Faulkner: "Re: major network performance difference between 2.4 and 2.6.2-rc2"
- In reply to: Randazzo, Michael: "RE: Kernel 2.x POSIX Compliance/Conformance..."
- Next in thread: J.A. Magallon: "Re: Kernel 2.x POSIX Compliance/Conformance..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "Randazzo, Michael" <RANDAZZO@ddc-web.com> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:51:17 -0800
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 12:18, Randazzo, Michael wrote:
> Where are the kernel calls defined for locks and semaphores?
>
> How come the kernel headers don't define Posix.4
> semaphores (_POSIX_SEMAPHROES) or Posix itself
> (_POSIX_VERSION is undefined)
>
I think you need to read "Linux Device Drivers". If you don't want to
buy it, you can read it for free online.
http://www.xml.com/ldd/chapter/book/
Chapter 9, pages 284-286 discusses locking and atomic operations.
-- Torrey Hoffman <thoffman@arnor.net> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Jim Faulkner: "Re: major network performance difference between 2.4 and 2.6.2-rc2"
- In reply to: Randazzo, Michael: "RE: Kernel 2.x POSIX Compliance/Conformance..."
- Next in thread: J.A. Magallon: "Re: Kernel 2.x POSIX Compliance/Conformance..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|