Re: [ACPI] acpi problem with nforce motherboards and ethernet
From: Luis Miguel García (ktech_at_wanadoo.es)
Date: 02/05/04
- Previous message: Thomas Glanzmann: "Re: 2.6.0, cdrom still showing directories after being erased"
- In reply to: David Ford: "Re: [ACPI] acpi problem with nforce motherboards and ethernet"
- Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: [ACPI] acpi problem with nforce motherboards and ethernet"
- Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: [ACPI] acpi problem with nforce motherboards and ethernet"
- Reply: Daniel Drake: "Re: [ACPI] acpi problem with nforce motherboards and ethernet"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 22:27:55 +0100 To: David Ford <david+challenge-response@blue-labs.org>
David Ford wrote:
> I have the same problem. I "solved" it a while ago by mucking with
> the AGP stuff. IIRC, it was turning off AGP fast writes or 8x or
> something similar in cmos. Went from incredibly broken to stable
> instantly. I'll check my cmos settings in a bit and refresh my memory.
>
> What patches are you using?
I'm using nforce2-apic.patch and nforce2-disconnect-quirk.patch that
Andrew Morton have sent to me. I think they have been included in
previous mm kernels but now are droped because they caused some
temperature problems for some people with no nforce motherboards.
If you want it, I can send it to you.
By the way, is anyone involved in solving the IO-APIC thing in nforce
motherboards? Anyone trying a different approach? Anyone contacting
nvidia about this problem?
> p.s. reiserfs is pretty useless against crashes. hundreds of files
> around the harddrive get messed up everytime the machine locks
> up...files that haven't been used in weeks, as well as files opened
> read-only, i.e. libraries.
I don't think this could be a reiserfs problem, because all the computer
gets frezzed and locked, but perhaps someone at Namesys can realize why
files gets deleted all over the hard disc.
Thanks.
Luis Miguel Garcia
>
> p.s. reiserfs is pretty useless against crashes. hundreds of files
> around the harddrive get messed up everytime the machine locks
> up...files that haven't been used in weeks, as well as files opened
> read-only, i.e. libraries.
>
> Luis Miguel García wrote:
>
>> (sorry with my sucking english)
>>
>> ok, let me know if you know for me to test something with this newer
>> mm kernels.
>>
>> by the way, yes, I'm experiencing the lockups. Not with heavy io, but
>> almost when I boot and enter X. The system gets completly frozzened
>> and the HD led keps on. When I reboot with a sane kernel, I found
>> several files from my /home directory are deleted or filled with
>> garbage.
>>
>> Now, I patch each kernel I use with the two patches Andrew sent to me
>> and I'm having no problems.
>>
>> Actually i'm running 2.6.2-ck1 + nforce-patches and the temperature
>> of the system is 55º while idle, and 631 while compiling (only cpu
>> fan, no case fans). I don't know if it's high (some people reported
>> high temperatures with this patches) but it runs very well this way.
>>
>> If you want for me to test some patches or something, please drop me
>> a note.
>>
>> Thanks a lot...
>>
>> Luis Miguel García
>>
>> P.S.: by the way, why am I getting strage "arabesque" characters when
>> I reply to your emails? Perhaps something with wrong encoding?
>>
>>> This is interesting, I will test it myself later on. At one point Len
>>> admitted to owning "foreign hardware :p" so maybe this could get
>>> resolved.
>>>
>>> Personally I haven't tried kernels with newer forcedeth drivers,
>>> because I
>>> can no longer explicitely set the power state of the NIC to D3. The
>>> machine complains about irqs (new debugging code since forcedeth
>>> v.20 or
>>> so) and will not powerdown.
>>>
>>> On another note, have you noticed lockups of your system with heavy io?
>>> Think of fsck'ing, burning cdroms, du on large dirs etc? Maybe it is
>>> helpful to set up a list of boards and document what works or
>>> doesn't work
>>> with which kernel. For instance the lockups with heavy io seem to be
>>> resolved here if I leave APIC from my kernel.
>>>
>>> Arjen
>>>
>>> On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, [ISO-8859-15] Luis Miguel Garc?a wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Hi:
>>>>>
>>>>> Since Andrew Morton picked up latest acpi bk updates, nforce
>>>>> motherboards have problems, mainly with ethernet adapters.
>>>>> Reporters say that with acpi=off, the problm gets fixed, so we
>>>>> think the problem could be acpi. Some more useful info:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Luis Miguel Garc?a wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> >> When I try to boot with latest mm series (such as actual
>>>>>>> rc3-mm1 or
>>>>>>> >> rc2-mm2), my nforce ethernet device doesn't works. It worked
>>>>>>> in the past
>>>>>>> >> with the forcedeth reverse engineered driver but now it keeps
>>>>>>> for 30 or
>>>>>>> >> more seconds halted (at boot) and then the network device
>>>>>>> dosn't run.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Here is the dmesg of rc3-mm1. Do you want for me to test
>>>>>>> something? Thanks!
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> P.S.: The ACPI related messages are larger that in rc3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My e100 on an nforce2 won't work in rc3-mm1.
>>>>> The "acpi=off" boot parameter makes it go.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And for the record, I can boot with that kernel and save one dmesg
>>>>> for you if you want. Only send me a request and I'll send it to you.
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S.: Sent any messages you want directly to me as i'm not
>>>>> subscribed to acpi-devel.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Luis Miguel Garc?a
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> >Which part of nforce support are you talking about luis?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> >On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> >> Luis Miguel Garc?a <ktech@wanadoo.es> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>> > Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>> > >>
>>>>>>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.2/2.6.2-mm1/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > >> - Merged some page reclaim fixes from Nick and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikita. These yield some
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > >> performance improvements in low memory and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> heavy paging situations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>>>> >>> > Andrew, do you know if this acpi pull down has nforce
>>>>>>>>> support fixed?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> It doesn't appear that way.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>> > Or perhaps it's even unnotified to the acpi team?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> I do not know. Sending them a bugzilla ID would help, if
>>>>>>> such a thing exists.
>>>>>>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Thomas Glanzmann: "Re: 2.6.0, cdrom still showing directories after being erased"
- In reply to: David Ford: "Re: [ACPI] acpi problem with nforce motherboards and ethernet"
- Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: [ACPI] acpi problem with nforce motherboards and ethernet"
- Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: [ACPI] acpi problem with nforce motherboards and ethernet"
- Reply: Daniel Drake: "Re: [ACPI] acpi problem with nforce motherboards and ethernet"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
