reiserfs for bkbits.net?
From: Larry McVoy (lm_at_bitmover.com)
Date: 02/11/04
- Previous message: Ross Dickson: "[PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaround instead of apic ack delay."
- Next in thread: Sander: "Re: reiserfs for bkbits.net?"
- Reply: Sander: "Re: reiserfs for bkbits.net?"
- Reply: Mihai RUSU: "Re: reiserfs for bkbits.net?"
- Reply: Erik Hensema: "Re: reiserfs for bkbits.net?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 07:23:49 -0800 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
We're moving openlogging back to our offices and I'm experimenting with
filesystems to see what gives the best performance for BK usage. Reiserfs
looks pretty good and I'm wondering if anyone knows any reasons that we
shouldn't use it for bkbits.net. Also, would it help if the journal was
on a different disk? Most of the bkbits traffic is read so I doubt it.
Please cc me, I'm not on the list.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Ross Dickson: "[PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaround instead of apic ack delay."
- Next in thread: Sander: "Re: reiserfs for bkbits.net?"
- Reply: Sander: "Re: reiserfs for bkbits.net?"
- Reply: Mihai RUSU: "Re: reiserfs for bkbits.net?"
- Reply: Erik Hensema: "Re: reiserfs for bkbits.net?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]