Re: reiserfs for bkbits.net?
From: Mihai RUSU (dizzy_at_roedu.net)
Date: 02/12/04
- Previous message: Miklos Szeredi: "notyet in mount_is_safe()"
- In reply to: Larry McVoy: "Re: reiserfs for bkbits.net?"
- Next in thread: Edward Shishkin: "Re: reiserfs for bkbits.net?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:47:34 +0200 (EET) To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:29:16AM -0800, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
> > http://pcbunn.cacr.caltech.edu/gae/3ware_raid_tests.htm
> >
> > They needed 200MByte/sec disk transfer speed. this is how they got it.
>
> Our workload is MUCH less friendly than bonnie. We typically have lots
> of traffic spread over lots of small files. With 1-3 outstanding
> requests (i.e., just at the point where disk sort does you little good).
Hmm, you could try parallel bonnie++ instances then:
- - synchronized
$ bonnie++ -d /path/to/testdir -s0 -n 4096:16000:64000:64 -p 10
then 10 times of
$ bonnie++ -d /path/to/testdir -s0 -n 4096:16000:64000:64 -y
- - or just run them in background unsynchronized
- --
Mihai RUSU Email: dizzy@roedu.net
GPG : http://dizzy.roedu.net/dizzy-gpg.txt WWW: http://dizzy.roedu.net
"Linux is obsolete" -- AST
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAKz2vPZzOzrZY/1QRAjs5AJ9E9wjayUmvKLrhsZ16KMnrm0OqXgCgqWy9
jtyLokxSBNvjqz1b8VfaDiM=
=jHZe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Miklos Szeredi: "notyet in mount_is_safe()"
- In reply to: Larry McVoy: "Re: reiserfs for bkbits.net?"
- Next in thread: Edward Shishkin: "Re: reiserfs for bkbits.net?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
