Re: JFS default behavior (was: UTF-8 in file systems? xfs/extfs/etc.)
From: Jamie Lokier (jamie_at_shareable.org)
Date: 02/12/04
- Previous message: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: 2.6.1-mm4"
- In reply to: Andy Isaacson: "Re: JFS default behavior (was: UTF-8 in file systems? xfs/extfs/etc.)"
- Next in thread: Robin Rosenberg: "Re: JFS default behavior (was: UTF-8 in file systems? xfs/extfs/etc.)"
- Reply: Robin Rosenberg: "Re: JFS default behavior (was: UTF-8 in file systems? xfs/extfs/etc.)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:54:51 +0000 To: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
Andy Isaacson wrote:
> Why on earth is JFS worried about the filename, anyways? Why has it
> *ever* had *any* behavior other than "string of bytes, delimited with /,
> terminated with \0" ?
Perhaps for the same reason that these other in-tree filesystems are
sensitive to the character encoding:
Joliet (ISO-9660 extension), FAT/VFAT, NTFS, BeFS, SMBFS, CIFS.
Those filesystems will also fail, or give unexpected behaviour (such
as bytes being changed to '?'), if you pass them names which are not
in the appropriate encoding.
-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: 2.6.1-mm4"
- In reply to: Andy Isaacson: "Re: JFS default behavior (was: UTF-8 in file systems? xfs/extfs/etc.)"
- Next in thread: Robin Rosenberg: "Re: JFS default behavior (was: UTF-8 in file systems? xfs/extfs/etc.)"
- Reply: Robin Rosenberg: "Re: JFS default behavior (was: UTF-8 in file systems? xfs/extfs/etc.)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]