Re: PATCH, RFC: 2.6 Documentation/Codingstyle
From: Kevin O'Connor (kevin_at_koconnor.net)
Date: 02/14/04
- Previous message: John Dee: "Re: is nForce2 good choice under Linux?"
- In reply to: Michael Frank: "PATCH, RFC: 2.6 Documentation/Codingstyle"
- Next in thread: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: PATCH, RFC: 2.6 Documentation/Codingstyle"
- Reply: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: PATCH, RFC: 2.6 Documentation/Codingstyle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:38:21 -0500 To: Michael Frank <mhf@linuxmail.org>
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 06:15:10AM +0800, Michael Frank wrote:
> +int fun(int )
> +{
> + int result = 0;
> + char *buffer = kmalloc(SIZE);
> +
> + if (buffer == 0) {
> + result = -1;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (condition1) {
> + while (loop1) {
> + ...
> + }
> + result = 1;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + if (condition2) {
> + while (loop2) {
> + ...
> + }
> + result = 2;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +out:
> + if (buffer)
> + kfree(buffer);
> + return result;
> +}
This is a bit of a nitpick, but if you're going to give a code example in a
file titled "Coding style" I'd recommend two changes:
1 - kfree already checks for null, so checking for null before calling
kfree is pointless.
2 - I personally think testing pointers against an integer is bad style, so
I'd prefer to see the original test changed to "if (!buffer)" or
less-preferably "if (buffer == NULL)".
> +Macros with multiple statements should be enclosed in a do - while block.
> +
> +#define macrofun(a,b,c) \
> +do { \
> + if (a == 5) \
> + do_this(b,c); \
> + \
> +} while (0)
Enclosing macros in a do-while block is sound advice, but the above is an
example of something that should be an inline function.
-Kevin
-- --------------------------------------------------------------------- | Kevin O'Connor "BTW, IMHO we need a FAQ for | | kevin@koconnor.net 'IMHO', 'FAQ', 'BTW', etc. !" | --------------------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: John Dee: "Re: is nForce2 good choice under Linux?"
- In reply to: Michael Frank: "PATCH, RFC: 2.6 Documentation/Codingstyle"
- Next in thread: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: PATCH, RFC: 2.6 Documentation/Codingstyle"
- Reply: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: PATCH, RFC: 2.6 Documentation/Codingstyle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|