Re: pnp missing proc entries?
From: Mark Hindley (mark_at_hindley.uklinux.net)
Date: 02/21/04
- Previous message: Mark Hindley: "[PATCH] 2.6.3 fix 8250_pnp resource allocation"
- In reply to: Adam Belay: "Re: pnp missing proc entries?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:33:56 +0000 To: Adam Belay <ambx1@neo.rr.com>, Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.uklinux.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:24:14AM +0000, Adam Belay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 07:44:14AM +0000, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have just switched to 2.6 and am trying to resolve and irq conflict
> > between a sound card and internal modem.
>
> Is the pnp layer complaining about this conflict? Are you using pnpbios
> support? Are both the sound card and internal modem isapnp devices?
Both are internal -- Rockwell/ALS100. I get no complaints from the pnp
layer, other than a refusal to config one if the other modules is
loaded. Both want to use irq 5. I have pnpbios in too.
I have just fixed a problem with unloading the 8250_pnp module, so am
hoping I can delve into this a bit more.
It seems that pnp is only trying the first config option for the device
and then bailing out if that won't fit with what else is setup.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Mark Hindley: "[PATCH] 2.6.3 fix 8250_pnp resource allocation"
- In reply to: Adam Belay: "Re: pnp missing proc entries?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
