Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64
From: Clay Haapala (chaapala_at_cisco.com)
Date: 02/23/04
- Previous message: Johannes Stezenbach: "Re: fbdv/fbcon pending problems"
- In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64"
- Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:51:07 -0600
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Linus Torvalds outgrape:
> Actually, I'm a bit disgusted at Intel for not even _mentioning_ AMD
> in their documentation or their releases, so I'd almost be inclined
> to rename the thing as "AMD64" just to give credit where credit is
> due. However, it's just not worth the pain and confusion.
I move we:
s/ia64/itanic/g
s/x86_64/ia64/g
and acknowledge that the "a" in "ia64" now stands for "AMD".
--
Clay Haapala (chaapala@cisco.com) Cisco Systems SRBU +1 763-398-1056
6450 Wedgwood Rd, Suite 130 Maple Grove MN 55311 PGP: C89240AD
Not everything derived from the base class "patentable" inherits the
"non-obvious, "non-trivial", and "original" attributes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Johannes Stezenbach: "Re: fbdv/fbcon pending problems"
- In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64"
- Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
