Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64
viro_at_parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
Date: 02/24/04
- Previous message: Kees Bakker: "Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64"
- In reply to: Kees Bakker: "Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64"
- Next in thread: Andrew Walrond: "Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:59:17 +0000 To: Kees Bakker <kees.bakker@altium.nl>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 10:47:06AM +0100, Kees Bakker wrote:
> >>>>> Linus Torvalds writes:
> >
> > So AMD64 is a bad name, partly for the same reason IA32 is a horrible name
> > (and who have you ever heard use the IA32 name except for people who are
> > paid to do so by Intel?)
>
> So, what about these OSDL people :-)
> http://www.osdl.org/projects/26lnxstblztn/results/
^^^^^^^^^^^^
You know, it probably violates some IBM patents...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Kees Bakker: "Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64"
- In reply to: Kees Bakker: "Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64"
- Next in thread: Andrew Walrond: "Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
