Re: can i modify ls

From: James Lamanna (jlamanna_at_ugcs.caltech.edu)
Date: 02/24/04

  • Next message: James Bottomley: "RE: [PATCH][BUGFIX] : megaraid patch for 2.10.1 (irq disable bug fix)"
    To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
    Date:	Tue, 24 Feb 2004 07:04:58 -0800
    
    

    On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 02:33:00AM +0530, Gautam Pagedar wrote:
    >> i am new to this mailing list, so please bear with me if i don't follow
    >> certain rules till i get used to it. >> I am a research student and
    >> currently working on a project to tweak the working of 'ls' command
    >> depending on >> my requirement. I have observed that 'ls' show ALL THE
    >> FILES and DIRECTORIES in a particular location even >> though a user
    >> has no access rights to it. I want to hide all
    >> such files for that particular user.

    > It already works like you expect it to do:

    > erik@zurix:/tmp/test >mkdir a b
    > erik@zurix:/tmp/test >touch a/c
    > erik@zurix:/tmp/test >ls -lR
    > .:
    > total 1
    > drwxr-xr-x 2 erik users 72 Feb 24 11:49 a/ ./a:
    > total 0
    > -rw-r--r-- 1 erik users 0 Feb 24 11:49 c erik@zurix:/tmp/test >chmod -r a
    > erik@zurix:/tmp/test >ls -lR
    > .:
    > total 1
    > d-wx--x--x 2 erik users 72 Feb 24 11:49 a/ ls: ./a: Permission denied
    > erik@zurix:/tmp/test >chmod -x a
    > erik@zurix:/tmp/test >cd a
    > a: Permission denied.

    I think the behavior that he is looking for is the old behavior that
    Novell Netware used to exhibit - if you don't have any permissions at all,
    it wouldn't list the directory anywhere (at least in windows-type file
    browsers):

    james@agard:~/s$ su
    Password:
    agard:/home/james/s# touch c
    agard:/home/james/s# chmod 600 c
    agard:/home/james/s# mkdir b
    agard:/home/james/s# mkdir a
    agard:/home/james/s# chmod 700 a
    agard:/home/james/s# ls -alR
    .:
    total 16
    drwxr-xr-x 4 james james 4096 Feb 23 15:10 .
    drwxr-xr-x 48 james james 4096 Feb 23 15:09 ..
    drwx------ 2 root root 4096 Feb 23 15:10 a
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 23 15:10 b
    -rw------- 1 root root 0 Feb 23 15:09 c

    ./a:
    total 8
    drwx------ 2 root root 4096 Feb 23 15:10 .
    drwxr-xr-x 4 james james 4096 Feb 23 15:10 ..

    ./b:
    total 8
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 23 15:10 .
    drwxr-xr-x 4 james james 4096 Feb 23 15:10 ..
    agard:/home/james/s# exit
    exit

    james@agard:~/s$ ls -alR
    .:
    total 16
    drwxr-xr-x 4 james james 4096 Feb 23 15:10 .
    drwxr-xr-x 48 james james 4096 Feb 23 15:09 ..
    drwx------ 2 root root 4096 Feb 23 15:10 a
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 23 15:10 b
    -rw------- 1 root root 0 Feb 23 15:09 c
    ls: ./a: Permission denied

    ./b:
    total 8
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 23 15:10 .
    drwxr-xr-x 4 james james 4096 Feb 23 15:10 ..
    james@agard:~/s$

    So in the user directory listing above, he doesn't want the directory a or
    the file c to be displayed at all (since the user doing the ls has no
    permissions on either).
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  • Next message: James Bottomley: "RE: [PATCH][BUGFIX] : megaraid patch for 2.10.1 (irq disable bug fix)"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [PATCH][RFC] Make /proc/<pid> chmodable
      ... Why do you think users should not be allowed to chmod their processes' ... My excuse is this isn't such a new feature, Openwall had ... so I figured that problem (whatever their patch is about) ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [PATCH] bogus __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__ usage
      ... > (nothing to fix, they were defining it and including unistd.h for no ... used as a kernel syscall, potentially also clone and _exit, when they are ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [Fwd: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.4]
      ... We are starting to see priority inversion problems. ... this one is interesting - does the jackd highprio thread start new ... same exit() scenario. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: mremap() bug IMHO not in 2.2
      ... > Just guessing, but would a zero-length vma be rounded up to a page, and ... vma's (fork() and exit()) simply knows that a vma can never be ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: support of older compilers
      ... Or is it just lying around for ... changes (probably GCC changes). ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)