Re: [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaround instead of apic ack delay.

From: Prakash K. Cheemplavam (PrakashKC_at_gmx.de)
Date: 02/25/04

  • Next message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Any recommended PATA or SATA chip for kernel 2.6.x ?" 
    Date:	Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:49:56 +0100
To: ross@datscreative.com.au

    Ross Dickson wrote:
    > On Monday 23 February 2004 11:37, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
    >
    >>Oh before I forget, I had to resolve a reject by hand, but I *think* I
    >>did it right. (And yes, I used your corrected versionof the patch.)
    >>Well, maybe you take a look over the patch and rediff. :-)
    >>
    >>Prakash
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    > Hi Prakash,
    > Patches attached rediffed for 2.6.3 and 2.6.3-mm3.

    Hi Ross,

    so I am running this patch now since you released it (5:21h) and so far
    stable. Temp is better, bt not as goos as pic mode (about 3-4°C higher).
    Nevertheless, nice work!

    Thanks,

    Prakash
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  • Next message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Any recommended PATA or SATA chip for kernel 2.6.x ?"