Serial ATA (SATA) status report
From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik_at_pobox.com)
Date: 02/26/04
- Previous message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: 2.6.3-mm3"
- Next in thread: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Serial ATA (SATA) status report"
- Reply: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Serial ATA (SATA) status report"
- Maybe reply: Kyle Wong: "Re: Serial ATA (SATA) status report"
- Reply: Mark Watts: "Re: Serial ATA (SATA) status report"
- Maybe reply: Adam Radford: "RE: Serial ATA (SATA) status report"
- Reply: Justin Cormack: "Re: Serial ATA (SATA) status report"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 21:34:37 -0500 To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
attached.
Serial ATA (SATA) for Linux
status report
Feb 25, 2004
Hardware support
================
Intel ICH5 and ICH5-R
---------------------
Summary: No TCQ. Looks like a PATA controller, but with a few added,
non-standard SATA port controls. Hardware does not support hotplug.
"Coldplug" support is potentially feasible.
libata driver status: Production, but see issue #2, #3, #4.
drivers/ide driver status: Production, but see issue #1, #2.
Issue #1: Depending on BIOS settings, IDE driver may lock up computer
when probing drives.
Issue #2: Excessive interrupts are seen in some configurations.
Issue #3: "Enhanced mode" or "SATA-only mode" may need to be set in BIOS.
Issue #4: Driver disables SATA port on unload, but does not re-enable
SATA port on load.
Intel ICH6 ("AHCI")
-------------------
Summary: Per-device queues, full SATA control including hotplug
and PM.
libata driver status: "looks like ICH5" support available in ata_piix
very soon. Full support available in a week or two.
Promise TX2/TX4/SX4
-------------------
Summary: Per-host queues on all controllers. Full SATA control
including hotplug and PM on all but one controller.
libata driver status: Beta, but see issue #5.
Issue #5: Some boards appear to have PATA as well as SATA ports. PATA
is not currently supported, and no plans have yet been made to rectify
this. Ideally drivers/ide would drive PATA, but if they are the same
PCI device, that would not be feasible.
Silicon Image 3112/3114
-----------------------
Summary: No TCQ. Looks like a PATA controller, but with full SATA
control including hotplug and PM.
libata driver status: Alpha.
drivers/ide driver status: Production, but see issue #4.
Issue #4: Need to have the most recent fixes posted to lkml, for stable
operation and full performance (where possible).
Silicon Image 3124
------------------
Soon, hopefully. User-written.
Broadcom/ServerWorks/Apple
--------------------------
Summary: Huge per-device queues, full SATA control including hotplug
and PM.
libata driver status: Beta.
VIA
--- Summary: No TCQ. Looks like a PATA controller, but with full SATA control including hotplug and PM. libata driver status: Beta. SiS --- libata driver status: in progress (user-written) Vitesse ------- libata driver status: in progress Marvell ------- libata driver status: in progress Software support ================ Basic Serial ATA support ------------------------ The "ATA host state machine", the core of the entire driver, is considered production-stable. The error handling is _very_ simple, but at this stage that is an advantage. Error handling code anywhere is inevitably both complex and sorely under-tested. libata error handling is intentionally simple. Positives: Easy to review and verify correctness. Never data corruption. Negatives: if an error occurs, libata will simply send the error back the block layer. There are limited retries by the block layer, depending on the type of error, but there is never a bus reset. Or in other words: "it's better to stop talking to the disk than compound existing problems with further problems." As Serial ATA matures, and host- and device-side errata become apparent, the error handling will be slowly refined. I am planning to work with a few (kind!) disk vendors, to obtain special drives/firmwares that allow me to inject faults, and otherwise exercise error handling code. Queueing support ---------------- Even though some SATA host controllers on the market already support command queueing (a.k.a. "TCQ"), libata does not yet support it. However, libata was designed from the ground-up to support queueing, so I need only change a few lines of code, and write two functions, to enable this behavior. Queueing will be enabled in libata soon, but to do so requires a long stretch of testing on a large variety of controllers and drives. This is very time-intensive, and is the largest part of this task. Tangent: Host-based queueing and Native Command Queueing Queueing is the process of sending multiple commands to a single device, without waiting for prior commands to finish. This increases performance and reduces latency. There are three types of queueing in the ATA world: 1) "legacy TCQ" -- some PATA devices support this. Just ignore it, it's going away. 2) "host-based TCQ" -- the host controller supports a queue of drive commands, whether or not the drive supports it. 3) "Native Command Queueing" -- both host and drive cooperate in the queueing and execution of drive commands. This should provide the highest performance and lowest latency of all three options. #1 is support by drivers/ide _only_. libata will not support this. #2 will soon be supported by libata. #3 will be supported by libata when hardware is available from drive manufacturers. Hotplug support --------------- All SATA is hotplug. libata does not support hotplug... yet. Power Management support ------------------------ Over and above the power management specified in the ATA/ATAPI specification, one can aggressively control the power consumption of SATA hosts, the SATA bus, and the SATA device. SMART support ------------- Soon. Requires the capability to directly submit ATA commands from userspace to the low-level device, which must be added with care. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: 2.6.3-mm3"
- Next in thread: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Serial ATA (SATA) status report"
- Reply: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Serial ATA (SATA) status report"
- Maybe reply: Kyle Wong: "Re: Serial ATA (SATA) status report"
- Reply: Mark Watts: "Re: Serial ATA (SATA) status report"
- Maybe reply: Adam Radford: "RE: Serial ATA (SATA) status report"
- Reply: Justin Cormack: "Re: Serial ATA (SATA) status report"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|