Re: [RFC][PATCH] O(1) Entitlement Based Scheduler
From: Rik van Riel (riel_at_surriel.com)
Date: 02/27/04
- Previous message: Theodore Ts'o: "Re: [PATCH] Add getdents32t syscall"
- Maybe in reply to: John Lee: "[RFC][PATCH] O(1) Entitlement Based Scheduler"
- Next in thread: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] O(1) Entitlement Based Scheduler"
- Reply: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] O(1) Entitlement Based Scheduler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 22:44:55 -0500 (EST) To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> I disagree.
> It would be nice to have the scheduler identify processes which
> interface to user information devices, but it must be done in a way
> which doesn't open gaping security or misuse holes.
You seem to disagree only with what you think you read,
not with what the code does. Please read the actual
code, since it seems to do what you propose.
Rik
-- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Theodore Ts'o: "Re: [PATCH] Add getdents32t syscall"
- Maybe in reply to: John Lee: "[RFC][PATCH] O(1) Entitlement Based Scheduler"
- Next in thread: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] O(1) Entitlement Based Scheduler"
- Reply: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] O(1) Entitlement Based Scheduler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|