Re: 2.6.3-mm4
From: Mike Fedyk (mfedyk_at_matchmail.com)
Date: 02/27/04
- Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: Sysfs is too restrictive"
- In reply to: Jean Delvare: "Re: 2.6.3-mm4"
- Next in thread: Jean Delvare: "Re: 2.6.3-mm4"
- Reply: Jean Delvare: "Re: 2.6.3-mm4"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:16:42 -0800 To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Jean Delvare wrote:
> Quoting Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>:
>
>
>>Anyway, I think all you need to do is get the cvs tree of the
>>lmsensors package. Sensors people, the needed changes are commited
>>into the tree, right?
>
>
> No. The changes are waiting in my local repository, ready to be applied.
> I didn't want to apply them because we were supposed to release
> lm_sensors 2.8.5 (for Linux 2.6.3 users) and the sysfs names change
> wouldn't belong there.
>
> The libsensors patches are available on my personal server here:
> http://jdelvare.net1.nerim.net/sensors/
> Apply both patches in order and you'll get a 2.6.3-mm4-compliant
> library.
>
> I will apply the libsensors changes to the CVS repository as soon as the
> kernel modules changes are accepted into Linus' tree. If we did not
> release a new version since there, I'll take a CVS snapshot right
> before so that Linux 2.6.3 users have a usable version available (but
> my preference strongly goes to releasing 2.8.5 instead).
You have to be kidding me. Are you saying that with your patches to
libsensors it won't support 2.6.3 style sensor sysfs names?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: Sysfs is too restrictive"
- In reply to: Jean Delvare: "Re: 2.6.3-mm4"
- Next in thread: Jean Delvare: "Re: 2.6.3-mm4"
- Reply: Jean Delvare: "Re: 2.6.3-mm4"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|