Re: sched domains kernbench improvements
From: Nick Piggin (piggin_at_cyberone.com.au)
Date: 02/28/04
- Previous message: Maurice van der Stee: "2.6.4-rc1 oops on HPFS filesystem file rename"
- In reply to: Con Kolivas: "Re: sched domains kernbench improvements"
- Next in thread: Con Kolivas: "Re: sched domains kernbench improvements"
- Reply: Con Kolivas: "Re: sched domains kernbench improvements"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:15:19 +1100 To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Con Kolivas wrote:
>Hi Nick
>
>
>>So it is more a matter of tuning than anything fundamental
>>
>
>Geez I know how you feel... :-D
>
>
>I tried it on the X440 with sched smt disabled
>
>better than before but still slower than vanilla on half load; however better
>than vanilla on optimal and full load now! I wonder whether the worse result
>on half load is as relevant since this is 8x HT cpus?
>
>
Thanks. Yep the drop off at half load is to be expected with
CONFIG_SCHED_SMT turned off.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Maurice van der Stee: "2.6.4-rc1 oops on HPFS filesystem file rename"
- In reply to: Con Kolivas: "Re: sched domains kernbench improvements"
- Next in thread: Con Kolivas: "Re: sched domains kernbench improvements"
- Reply: Con Kolivas: "Re: sched domains kernbench improvements"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|