Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-libc-headers 2.6.3.0
From: Måns Rullgård (mru_at_kth.se)
Date: 02/29/04
- Previous message: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-libc-headers 2.6.3.0"
- In reply to: Mariusz Mazur: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-libc-headers 2.6.3.0"
- Next in thread: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-libc-headers 2.6.3.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:33:19 +0100
Mariusz Mazur <mmazur@kernel.pl> writes:
> On Sunday 29 of February 2004 22:03, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> If so, we actually have a bit of an issue w.r.t. the potential
>> legality of these headers. Technically they're incompatible with LGPL
>> and BSD-licensed libraries; I think we need some kind of official
>> declaration that compiling against them is permitted.
>
> /me knows nothing about legalities. So if you could explain exactly why, what
> to do about it and how can that help... (and why there wasn't any problem
> earlier, when people used headers from linux tarballs?)
Excuse my ignorance, but why can't the headers from the kernel still
be used. They seem to be working fine here.
-- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-libc-headers 2.6.3.0"
- In reply to: Mariusz Mazur: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-libc-headers 2.6.3.0"
- Next in thread: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-libc-headers 2.6.3.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
