Re: Worrisome IDE PIO transfers...
From: Christophe Saout (christophe_at_saout.de)
Date: 03/01/04
- Previous message: Michael Frank: "Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: Dropping CONFIG_PM_DISK?"
- In reply to: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: Worrisome IDE PIO transfers..."
- Next in thread: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: Worrisome IDE PIO transfers..."
- Reply: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: Worrisome IDE PIO transfers..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 14:23:02 +0100
Am Mo, den 01.03.2004 schrieb Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz um 01:47:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/bart/dm-byteswap-2.6.4-rc1.patch
>
> Guess what's this? :)
The thieves... they've stolen my precioussss. ;)
> It is simply a stripped down dm-crypt.c, so all credits go to Christophe.
> I have tested it quickly with loop device and it seems to work.
Yes, it's not that complicated. Looks good.
BTW: You don't need the km_types voodoo as the conversion routine is
never called from a softirq context and you are allowed (but should try
to avoid it) to sleep. You could add a conditional reschedule after
kunmapping the buffers to keep the latency low on non-preempt kernels.
BTW: I've got some cleanups and a small fix in Andrew's latest tree
(using a #define for the log prefix and I bvec array thingy).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Michael Frank: "Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: Dropping CONFIG_PM_DISK?"
- In reply to: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: Worrisome IDE PIO transfers..."
- Next in thread: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: Worrisome IDE PIO transfers..."
- Reply: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: Worrisome IDE PIO transfers..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|