Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3
From: David Weinehall (david_at_southpole.se)
Date: 03/03/04
- Previous message: Andrew Ho: "Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3"
- In reply to: Andrew Ho: "Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3"
- Next in thread: Robin Rosenberg: "Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3"
- Reply: Robin Rosenberg: "Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 02:41:15 +0100 To: Andrew Ho <andrewho@animezone.org>
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:30:32PM -0500, Andrew Ho wrote:
> XFS is the best filesystem.
Well it'd better be, it's 10 times the size of ext3, 5 times the size of
ReiserFS and 3.5 times the size of JFS.
And people say size doesn't matter.
Regards: David Weinehall
-- /) David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /) Northern lights wander (\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Full colour fire (/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Andrew Ho: "Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3"
- In reply to: Andrew Ho: "Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3"
- Next in thread: Robin Rosenberg: "Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3"
- Reply: Robin Rosenberg: "Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
