Re: [ANNOUNCE] udev 021 release

From: Ed Tomlinson (edt_at_aei.ca)
Date: 03/03/04

  • Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6 ide-cd DMA ripping"
    To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
    Date:	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:22:17 -0500
    
    

    On March 03, 2004 04:56 am, Michael Weiser wrote:
    > Normally with static /dev one has a /dev/dsp device for example. As soon
    > as an application tries to open it the kernel would try to load a module
    > "sound" or "char-major-something" if sound support isn't compiled into
    > it. Now with udev I'll never get /dev/dsp in the first place and there's
    > no mechanism like devfs's file open monitoring and subsequent device
    > file creation. So my idea is to initialise /dev with some static files,
    > for hardware I know is there but hasn't had a driver loaded yet. My
    > question is: Is there a nicer and more elegant way than just unpacking a
    > tarball into /dev before starting udevd? A tarball would also break a
    > (theoretical) use of dynamic major/minor numbers by the kernel.

    Would it be possible to have something in the module itself? i.e. We create
    a new macro to add info that a script can use. This info could live in a new file
    in lib/modules or in the actual module. This could be used to create the static
    setup dynamicly.

    This item keeps coming up as the one feature that devfs has and udev
    does not. It keeps getting dismissed. Users seem to actually want it...

    Ed Tomlinson

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  • Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6 ide-cd DMA ripping"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: New entry for MAINTAINERS
      ... The Dark Matter Theory of Linux which explains why the kernel ... > tarball is so much larger than can be reasonably expected and is ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • New entry for MAINTAINERS
      ... The Dark Matter Theory of Linux which explains why the kernel ... tarball is so much larger than can be reasonably expected and is ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [PATCH 1/3] 2.6.8-rc4-mm1 - Fix UML build
      ... can access them all, and initialized data all before uninitialized, so ... SYMLINKS:= $,$/$f) ... semaphore.c-dir = kernel ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
      ... > rebooted to a kernel that doesn't have the RT-preempt patch but ... getting a very verbose running trail, almost like an strace output, ... Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • RE: Error mounting root fs on 72:01 using Promise FastTrak TX2000 (PDC20271)
      ... Subject: Error mounting root fs on 72:01 using Promise FastTrak TX2000 ... > Now I'm sucessfully booting my system with the 2.4.23 kernel using ... I think it's when the ATARAID driver is about to fire up. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)