Re: [CFT][PATCH] 2.6.4-rc1 remove x86 boot page tables
From: Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm_at_xmission.com)
Date: 03/03/04
- Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: poll() in 2.6 and beyond"
- In reply to: Tolentino, Matthew E: "RE: [CFT][PATCH] 2.6.4-rc1 remove x86 boot page tables"
- Next in thread: Dave Hansen: "Re: [CFT][PATCH] 2.6.4-rc1 remove x86 boot page tables"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "Tolentino, Matthew E" <matthew.e.tolentino@intel.com> Date: 03 Mar 2004 01:15:47 -0700
"Tolentino, Matthew E" <matthew.e.tolentino@intel.com> writes:
> > I have rewritten and compiled tested the boot_ioremap code but I don't
> > have a configuration to test it. This effects the EFI code and the
> > numa srat code. It might be worth replacing boot_ioremap with __va()
> > to reduce the amount of error checking necessary.
>
> I just blindly applied this patch and tried it on an x86 EFI system
> with no luck. It's not mapping correctly for some reason. I'll look
> at the problem closer in a bit.
Stupid question. What is efi doing in arch/i386 anyway?
All of the to be production efi x86 systems I have heard of support
x86-64. So shouldn't it be 64bit calls that we need to worry about?
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: poll() in 2.6 and beyond"
- In reply to: Tolentino, Matthew E: "RE: [CFT][PATCH] 2.6.4-rc1 remove x86 boot page tables"
- Next in thread: Dave Hansen: "Re: [CFT][PATCH] 2.6.4-rc1 remove x86 boot page tables"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
